ES1, a new lung carcinoma antibody— an immunohistochemical study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To characterize a single domain antibody (sdAb), AFAI, obtained by panning a naive phage display library of single domain antibodies against the non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line A549. AFAI recognizes a variant form of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6 or CEA6). METHODS AND RESULTS: Various normal tissues and 139 neoplastic lesions from lung and other organs were immunostained with ES1 antibody, a pentameric and highly avid form of AFAI. ES1 was immunoreactive with 34 of 35 non-squamous large cell lung carcinomas with staining intensities ranging from focal to extensive and from moderate to strong. Importantly, ES1 stained poorly differentiated lung adenocarcinomas and many undifferentiated large cell lung carcinomas that typically show negative immunoreactivity with an antibody specific for thyroid transcription factor-1. Non-lung adenocarcinomas showed more focal and weaker immunoreactivity than for lung adenocarcinoma. Other carcinomas showed negative or weak immunoreactivity and normal tissues showed no immunoreactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other antibodies used in the clinical evaluation of lung adenocarcinomas, ES1 is more lung carcinoma sensitive, more sensitive in immunostaining of poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas that are usually associated with distant metastasis and less immunoreactive with normal tissues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".