Could Diastereoselectivity in the Presence of O-2 Chiral Nonparticipating Groups Be an Indicator of Glycopyranosyl Oxacarbenium Ions in Glycosylation Reactions?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although long postulated, the existence of glycopyranosyl oxacarbenium ions as intermediates or transition states (TS) in chemical glycosylation reactions has not been convincingly demonstrated experimentally. It is anticipated that elucidation of such reactive species will greatly assist synthetic chemists to control the α/β stereoselectivity by rational means. Previous density functional theory (DFT) calculations from our group found that the torsion potential about C-2-O-2 in protected glycopyranosyl donors changed from a conventional 3-fold rotor to a 2-fold rotor with a strong syn (CH-2-C-2-O-2-CPg) preference once the donor was ionized to its oxacarbenium ion. This suggested to us that if CPg of the protecting group was a chiral carbon, then diastereoselectivity might be observed in glycosylation reactions that proceed through oxacarbenium ions. The hypothesis to test is as follows: if a nonparticipating O-2 racemic chiral protecting group exhibits diastereoselectivity in glycosylation reactions, then the reaction probably proceeds through an oxacarbenium ion intermediate or TS. We present data for O-2 ether-protected d-glucopyranosyl donors where the racemic protecting group 1-methyl 1'-methylcyclopropylmethyl (MCPM) provides the chirality. MCPM proves to be more activating than the O-2-benzyl ether, and in cases where the donor is otherwise deactivated, several examples of moderate diastereoselectivity are found. These results can be interpreted to indicate that a continuum of reactivity exists where some glycosyl donors form oxacarbenium ions in glycosylation reactions but more reactive donors do not. The strongly activating properties of the cyclopropylmethyl ether functionality and the ability to induce diastereoselectivity with chiral derivatives strongly suggest widespread applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".