MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994812157 · doi:10.4141/cjps07100

The biology of Canadian weeds. 3. <i>Lepidium draba</i> L., <i>L. chalepense</i> L., <i>L. appelianum</i> Al-Shehbaz (updated)

2008· article· en· W1994812157 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
A. Francis, Suzanne I. Warwick

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsBiologyNoxious weedRangelandInvasive speciesIntroduced speciesWeed controlAgroforestryForageAgronomyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper updates an earlier paper by Mulligan and Findlay (1974) on the cruciferous weeds Lepidium draba, L. chalepense and L. appelianum (treated in the previous paper as Cardaria draba, C. chalepensis and C. pubescens, respectively). Known collectively as hoary cresses, these species reached North America in the 19th and early 20th centuries as contaminants in seed or in ballast. The three species spread extensively in the western parts of the continent by the mid 20th century, partly through seed dissemination, but also by establishment of clonal patches and rhizomatous spread. In the prairie provinces the three species are weeds in grainfields, hayfields and forage crops, and have been largely under control in those crops since the 1970s. By the 1970s all three species had spread into agricultural regions of south central British Columbia and remain a serious problem there. They have also spread into forest, range, and riparian areas of Alberta and British Columbia and are among weedy threats to native ecosystems. Populations in Saskatchewan and Manitoba appear to have stabilized, but remain on noxious weed lists. In the western United States, the species have also spread from cultivated areas into rangelands, and L. draba in particular competes successfully with native vegetation, resulting in reduced local biodiversity. Lepidium draba can also reduce forage production, quality and palatability. Biocontrol measures for L. draba are under investigation. Mechanical controls have proved to be generally ineffective in large populations. Herbicides are effective in the short term in some agricultural crops, but do not provide long-term control, and are of restricted use on rangelands and at riparian sites. Potential beneficial uses of Lepidium draba in phytoremediation and as a source of disease-fighting chemical derivatives are reported. Key words: Lepidium draba, Lepidium chalepense, Lepidium appelianum, Cardaria draba, Cardaria chalepensis, Cardaria pubescens, hoary cress, white-top

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2008
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207