MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994904112 · doi:10.1094/pdis-07-13-0689-pdn

First Report of a 16SrI (Aster Yellows) Group Phytoplasma on Garlic (<i>Allium sativum</i>) in the United States

2013· article· en· W1994904112 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dimitre Mollov, B. E. L. Lockhart, Erika Saalau-Rojas, Carl J. Rosen

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplasmaBiologyAllium sativumAlliumAster yellowsCultivarHorticultureZiziphusGenBankVeterinary medicineAmpliconBlightBotanyPolymerase chain reactionMedicineRestriction fragment length polymorphism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the growing season of 2012, 35 garlic plant samples were submitted to the University of Minnesota Plant Disease Clinic for disease diagnosis. Samples originated from multiple counties throughout Minnesota as well as Iowa, Wisconsin, and South Dakota. Symptoms first appeared at the time plants were starting to produce scapes. Symptoms included leaf discoloration that varied from yellow to purple, plant stunting, and leaf tip necrosis. In severe cases, the plants wilted and died. Bulbs of affected plants ranged from being soft and small to almost normal-looking. Symptoms were similar to those associated with phytoplasma infection in other plants. Total genomic DNA was extracted from 30 symptomatic samples and five asymptomatic leaf samples using a Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and used with the universal phytoplasma primers P1/P7 in a direct PCR assay, and with P1/AYint in a nested PCR assay (2) to yield amplicons of 1.8 and 1.6 kb, respectively. Asymptomatic plants did not produce amplicons. Garlic cultivars displaying a range of symptoms tested positive for the presence of phytoplasma. These cultivars included: Susanville, Middle Eastern, Music, Ajo Rojo, Spanish Roja, Inchelium Red, Silver White, Asian Tempest, Chesnok Red, and Purple Glazer. The P1/P7 PCR products of 1,830 bp were purified using the PureLink PCR Purification kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and cloned in a pGem T-Easy vector system (Promega, Madison, WI). Sequences from a clone from each of Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KC000005, KC000006, and KC000007, respectively. A BLASTn similarity search revealed that the Wisconsin and Iowa isolates shared 99% homology to the sequences of 16SrI-A group phytoplasmas, aster yellows phytoplasma (AY389827), and aconitum proliferation phytoplasma (AF510323). The Minnesota isolate had 99% sequence homology to a 16SrI-B group phytoplasma, mulberry yellow dwarf phytoplasma (GQ249410). Also, the iPhyClassifier 16Sr group/subgroup classification based on similarity (3) analyses showed that the Wisconsin and Iowa phytoplasma isolates had 16S rDNA sequences in the 16SrI-A group with similarity coefficients of 0.97 and 1.00, respectively, to aster yellows witches'-broom phytoplasma AYWB (NC_007716). The same analysis revealed that the Minnesota phytoplasma isolate 16S rDNA sequence grouped with the 16SrI-B group onion yellows phytoplasma (NC_005303) with a similarity coefficient of 1.0. A phylogenic tree was deduced by the neighbor joining algorithm, clustering together the Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin isolate sequences with a 16SrI group phytoplasma. Aster yellows phytoplasma has been reported in North America, but only in Canada (1). This is the first documented occurrence of 16SrI aster yellows group phytoplasma in garlic in the United States. The spring of 2012 was unusually warm, and high leafhopper pressure was observed throughout the Midwest; above average numbers of many ornamental crops and small grains were infected with phytoplasma. These events may have contributed to the phytoplasma infection in garlic. References: (1) A. H. Khadhair et al. Microbiol. Res. 157:161, 2002. (2) C. D. Smart et al. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 62:2988, 1996. (3) Y. Zhao et al. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59:2582, 2009.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogensFrench-language works237,207