Abstract 3363: Identification and characterization of stem-like cells in human esophageal epithelial and adenocarcinoma cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The aim of this study was to identify and characterize stem-like cells in human normal esophageal epithelial and adenocarcinoma cell lines. The immortalized esophageal epithelial cell line, Het-1A, and the primary esophageal adenocarcinoma (EADC) cell line, OE33, were first studied by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence using a panel of antibodies to putative stem cell biomarkers which included CD34, CD44, CD44/CD24, CD117/integrin α6, Musashi I, EpiCam, and Oct 4. Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) was then used to isolate 15% of cells with the highest CD44 staining (CD44high) or reactive oxygen species (ROS) (ROShigh) and 15% of cells with the lowest (including negative) CD44 staining (CD44low) or ROS (ROSlow). Each cell population was further characterized using sphere-forming assays, soft agar clonogenic assays, flow cytometry for ROS, and synchrotron mid-infrared (IR) spectromicroscopy. CD44 positivity was found in 90% of Het-1A and 75% of OE33 cells overall. For both Het-1A and OE33 cell lines, spheroid formation (mean±SD/5000 cells) was significantly higher in cells expressing high levels of CD44 (Het-1A:138.33±2.08 vs. 97.67±1.53, p<0.01; OE33: 150.00±31.19 vs. 100.67±7.02, p=0.056) and low levels of ROS (Het-1A: 149.33±20.43 vs. 92.00±8.89, p=0.011; OE33: 199.67±31.63 vs. 119.33±14.47, p=0.016). Colony formation (mean±SD/1000 cells) was also found to be significantly higher in CD44high (Het-1A: 15.33±4.51 vs. 8.00±1.00, p=0.051; OE33: 92.67±11.02 vs. 18.00±1.73, p<0.01) and ROSlow (Het-1A: 45.00±1.00 vs. 31.67±3.79, p<0.01; OE33: 33.00±5.29 vs. 14.67±5.03, p=0.012) cell populations. Whereas OE33 CD44high cells were found to express consistently lower levels of ROS compared with OE33 CD44low cells (p<0.01), no differences in ROS expression were found in Het-1A cells sorted by CD44 expression. Spectromicroscopic analysis revealed only small non-significant differences between cell populations sorted by CD44 and ROS expression. We conclude that the higher rates of spheroid formation and clonogenicity of Het-1A and OE33 cells expressing high levels of CD44 (CD44high) and low levels of ROS (ROSlow) reflect an enrichment of stem-like cell populations in esophageal cell lines. However, the significant differences in ROS levels between CD44high OE33 cells and CD44high Het-1A cells suggests unique and biologically distinct pathways in stem-like cells derived from normal and malignant esophageal epithelia. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3363.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".