The enigmatic mating behaviour and reproduction of a simultaneous hermaphrodite, the nudibranch<i>Aeolidiella glauca</i>(Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hermaphroditic mating behaviour is poorly investigated and understood, especially in internally fertilized species. This study describes the mating behaviour and reproduction of the simultaneous hermaphrodite Aeolidiella glauca. Unlike other nudibranchs, A. glauca was found to transfer sperm via external spermatophores that were attached to the partner's back. Despite an elaborate courtship, the actual spermatophore transfer, which always involved two animals only, was of short duration. In most matings (88%) spermatophores were reciprocally exchanged. Shortly after transfer the ventral spermatophore cover dissolved and some sperm gathered on the epidermis. A few even penetrated epidermal cells, occasionally causing considerable damage. Most sperm, however, migrated along the body surface towards the gonopore. Migrating sperm needed 45 h to reach and enter the gonopore, but sperm consumption by the recipient sometimes delayed this process. Almost 30% of spermatophores fell off soon after transfer, but spermatophores from reciprocal matings and those placed in certain positions stayed on for longer. Slugs mated readily with different partners and egg production was very high. However, sperm from a single mating may not suffice to fertilize all eggs. Aeolidiella glauca's unique mating behaviour may offer ample opportunities for both sperm competition and alternative sperm utilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".