Hemodilution as a result of aggressive fluid resuscitation aggravates coagulopathy in a rat model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between dilution caused by fluid resuscitation and blood coagulability during ongoing, uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UHS) remains unclear. We hypothesized that dilution caused by fluid resuscitation may impair blood coagulability in UHS. METHODS: Eighteen rats underwent under halothane anesthesia. The UHS model consisted of the following phases: (1) an initial blood withdrawal of 2.5 mL per 100 g during 15 minutes, followed by UHS via tail amputation and fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's (LR) solution (0-60 minutes); (2) hemostasis and reinfusion of withdrawn blood and additional LR solution (60-100 minutes); and (3) observation of awake rats for 72 hours. Rats were randomized into three resuscitation regimens (n = 6 per group) during Phase I. LR solution was infused at a rate of 0.1 mL/min in Group 1, 0.25 mL/min in Group 2, and 0.75 mL/min in Group 3. Blood coagulability was assessed with a Sonoclot analysis, and survival to 72 hours were compared between groups. RESULTS: Both resuscitation regimens of Groups 2 and 3 increased the blood pressure and bleeding volume from the tail stump compared with Group 1 (p < 0.05). At the end of Phase I, the hematocrit decreased to 29% (3%) in Group 1, 23% (3%) in Group 2, and 12% (3%) in Group 3 (p < 0.05). Sonoclot analysis revealed a decreased clot rate of 16 (9) clot signal per minute in Group 2 and 14 (10) clot signal per minute in Group 3 compared with Group 1 (40 [10] clot signal per minute; p < 0.01). There was a significant correlation between clot rate and hematocrit values (r = +0.67, p < 0.01). Compared with Group 1, survival improved in Groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In a rat model of UHS, aggressive fluid resuscitation aggravated hemodilution and blood coagulability as well as and bleeding but improved the hemodynamics and survival. There was a positive correlation between hemodilution and coagulation indexes. Hemodilution, as part of fluid therapy, may affect coagulopathy in UHS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".