The effect of early <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> treatment on lung function in pediatric cystic fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the effect of treatment of early infection of P. aeruginosa on pulmonary function in pediatric CF patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of P. aeruginosa negative CF patients followed at Sick Kids from 1990 to 2007. Early P. aeruginosa infection was defined as the first respiratory culture for P. aeruginosa; patients were included if 5 years of follow-up pulmonary function data were available. Patients were divided into three groups (group 1: never infected, group 2: infected with subsequent clearance, and group 3: chronic infection or still receiving antipseudomonal antibiotics). Hierarchical linear models were used to estimate the effect of P. aeruginosa infection on spirometry. FEV(1) % predicted was the primary outcome. RESULTS: 116 patients were included. Forty-six (40%) patients remained P. aeruginosa negative throughout the observation period, 29 (25%) patients transiently infected with P. aeruginosa, and 41 (35%) patients were either currently infected or still receiving treatment. Baseline lung function was the same for all groups. Annual decline in FEV(1) % predicted during the study period was not different (-0.6%/year for patients that were never infected and -1.3%/year among patients previously infected). CONCLUSIONS: Lung function was not different between patients with early P. aeruginosa infection and those that never had P. aeruginosa infection. However given the slow rate of FEV(1) decline in the study population, a longer observation period and/or more sensitive outcomes measures may be required to exclude long-term detrimental effects of transient P. aeruginosa infection on lung function in CF patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".