Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay is an exploration of the way in which Jewish religious paradigms are manifested and sometimes subverted in Clarice Lispector’s novel The Passion According to G.H. The question which guides this enquiry is the theoretical issue of examining what is being represented in this text: What is the mimetic relationship between the character’s development and the ineffable referent to which the narrative refers? Utilizing a phenomenological philosophical hermeneutic literary methodology, it is found that an ineffable referent in the text of The Passion According to G.H. is articulated through a tension between religious reference and a self-reflective narrator questioning the limits of language. As this tension plays out, ostensibly through contemplation of a squashed cockroach, the narrator’s consciousness is transformed to an understanding larger than that of the ordinary quotidian. Ce travail est une exploration de la manière par laquelle des paradigmes religieux juifs sont manifestés et parfois renversés dans le roman de Clarice Lispector La passion selon G.H. La question qui guide cette enquête est la question théorique d’examiner ce qui est représenté dans ce texte : Quel est le rapport mimétique entre le développement du caractère et le référent inexprimable auxquel le récit se réfère? Utilisant la méthodologie littéraire de l’herméneutique philosophique phénoménologique, on le constate qu’un référent inexprimable dans le texte de La passion selon G.H. est articulé par une tension entre la référence religieuse et la réflexivité propre du narrateur, remettant en cause les limites de la langue. Comme cette tension a eu lieu, ostensiblement par la contemplation d’un cafard écrasé, la conscience du narrateur est transformée à un arrangement plus grand que celui du quotidien ordinaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".