Genetic structure of the introduced heaven tree (<i>Ailanthus altissima</i>) in Japan: evidence for two distinct origins with limited admixture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The heaven tree, Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle, was intentionally introduced from China to many temperate areas globally, where it has become successfully established. Here, we investigated the patterns of genetic differentiation between introduced Japanese A. altissima populations using both plastid and nuclear microsatellite markers. Three hundred and eighty-eight trees were sampled from six planted and 12 naturalized populations. Two distinct chloroplastic haplotypes were observed, which allowed us to separate two groups of trees, H1 and H3, containing 128 and 260 trees, respectively. Nine nuclear genetic microsatellites revealed 17.7 alleles per locus on average. These data did not indicate significant isolation-by-distance. Analysis of molecular variance showed the absence of genetic differentiation between the planted and naturalized populations. In contrast, the two groups defined according to the chloroplastic haplotypes (H1 and H3) were differentiated. STRUCTURE analysis showed that, within each haplotype group, most trees were strictly assigned to one cluster, with the exception of a few (ca. 30) trees. Our results indicate that (1) geographical genetic structure was weak, with high genetic variation among populations; (2) a congruent signal was revealed by chloroplastic and nuclear markers, indicating two distinct provenances; and (3) admixture between the two lineages has occurred, but remains limited. Several other invasive plant species have already been reported to exhibit similar trends; hence, future management of A. altissima might be required in Japan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".