Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prion protein gene Prnp encodes PrPSc, the major structural component of prions, infectious pathogens causing a number of disorders including scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Missense mutations in the human Prnp gene, PRNP, cause inherited prion diseases such as familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. In uninfected animals, Prnp encodes a GPI-anchored protein denoted PrPC, and in prion infections, PrPC is converted to PrPSc by templated refolding. Although Prnp is conserved in mammalian species, attempts to verify interactions of putative PrP-binding proteins by genetic means have proven frustrating in that two independent lines of Prnp gene ablated mice (Prnp0/0 mice: ZrchI and Npu) lacking PrPC remain healthy throughout development. This indicates that PrPC serves a function that is not apparent in a laboratory setting or that other molecules have overlapping functions. Shuttling or sequestration of synaptic Cu(II) via binding to N-terminal octapeptide residues and (or) signal transduction involving the fyn kinase are possibilities currently under consideration. A new point of entry into the issue of prion protein function has emerged from identification of a paralog, Prnd, with 25% coding sequence identity to Prnp. Prnd lies downstream of Prnp and encodes the Dpl protein. Like PrPC, Dpl is presented on the cell surface via a GPI anchor and has three alpha-helices: however, it lacks the conformationally plastic and octapeptide repeat domains present in its well-known relative. Interestingly, Dpl is overexpressed in two other lines of Prnp0/0 mice (Ngsk and Rcm0) via intergenic splicing events. These lines of Prnp0/0 mice exhibit ataxia and apoptosis of cerebellar cells, indicating that ectopic synthesis of Dpl protein is toxic to CNS neurons: this inference has now been confirmed by the construction of transgenic mice expressing Dpl under the direct control of the PrP promoter. Remarkably, Dpl-programmed ataxia is rescued by wt Prnp transgenes. The interaction between the Prnp and Prnd genes in mouse cerebellar neurons may have a physical correlate in competition between Dpl and PrPC within a common biochemical pathway that, when misregulated, leads to apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".