Swelling Dynamics of Multilayer Films of Weak Polyelectrolytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The swelling behavior of thin polyelectrolyte multilayers assembled from poly(acrylic acid) and poly(allylamine hydrochloride) under various pH conditions was characterized in real time by in situ single wavelength ellipsometry. Both the rates and extent of swelling were found to be independent of the solution environment, yet they depended strongly on the pH conditions under which the layers were fabricated. The transport mechanism could be determined by analyzing the rate of swelling and was also observed to vary significantly with the initial assembly conditions of the multilayer films. The swelling behavior was non-Fickian for films constructed with a deposition pH of 3.5, 5.0, and 6.5 for both polyelectrolytes. The time scales to reach maximum swelling depended strongly on pH assembly conditions and varied over at least 3 orders of magnitude from seconds to tens of minutes. Swelling of the films was also observed to depend strongly on the ambient humidity to which the films were exposed before measurement; for example, when equilibrated at 45% relative humidity prior to swelling, films assembled at pH = 3.5 required ∼1800 s to reach equilibrium, while the same films reached maximum swelling in ∼3 s when pre-exposed to an environment of 20% relative humidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".