The Sternomastoid Branch of the Occipital Artery: A Surgical Landmark for the Spinal Accessory Nerve in Selective Neck Dissections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anatomic relationship between the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) and the sternomastoid branch of the occipital artery (SBOA) and its utility as a surgical landmark during a selective neck dissection (SND). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Consecutive patients undergoing SND for squamous cancer from October 1, 2004 to February 28, 2005 were enrolled in this study. During surgery the distance between the SBOA and the point of insertion of the SAN into the sternomastoid muscle (SMM) was measured. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent 33 SND. The distance between the SBOA and SAN ranged between 1 and 11 mm, with a mean of 6.2 mm and a median of 6 mm. CONCLUSION: The relationship between these 2 structures has a range and constancy that is acceptable as a landmark. SIGNIFICANCE: This article presents a useful adjunct for location of the SAN in the anterior neck during SND.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".