MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995236907 · doi:10.1063/1.1385356

Electronic transport by small polarons in La0.5Sr0.5MnO3

2001· article· en· W1995236907 on OpenAlexafffund
É. Quenneville, Michel Meunier, A. Yelon, François Morin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPolaronCondensed matter physicsConductivityElectrical resistivity and conductivityThin filmMaterials scienceAdiabatic processChemistryPhysicsElectronThermodynamicsNanotechnologyPhysical chemistryNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical conductivity measurements on La0.5Sr0.5MnO3 (LSM5) thin films as a function of temperature are presented. These are used to demonstrate that the electronic transport in LSM5 is well described by the Emin–Holstein adiabatic small polaron model. Measurements have also been performed on bulk samples. Even if the conductivity behaves somewhat differently in the latter case, the same polaronic model still applies. The polaron densities extracted from conductivity measurements are very similar, ranging from 7 to 8×1021 cm−3 for thin films and are 9.1×1021 cm−3 for bulk samples. These results agree quite well with the nominal polaron density for LSM5, 8.4×1021 cm−3. We have also derived important quantities for transport in LSM5. For thin films, we obtained hopping energies, WH, ranging between 73 and 99 meV and almost constant, at 34 meV, for bulk samples. By fitting conductivity measurements from 50 to 1123 K, we also find the zero point interaction constant, γ0, to be 0.35 in thin films. These conductivity results are compared with the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materialsFrench-language works237,207