MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995289826 · doi:10.1159/000125125

Influence of the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala on the Content of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor in the Median Eminence

2008· article· en· W1995289826 on OpenAlexaff
Serge Beaulieu, Georges Pelletier, Hubert Vaudry, Nicholas Barden

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsMedian eminenceNucleusAmygdalaHypothalamusNeurophysinsInternal medicineEndocrinologySupraoptic nucleusCentral nucleus of the amygdalaChemistryNeuroscienceBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The central nucleus of the amygdala possesses numerous neurons containing corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF). This study demonstrates a striking decrease of the CRF-like immunoreactivity in the median eminence at both 1 and 2 weeks after bilateral lesions of the amygdaloid central nucleus. Lesion of the amygdaloid central nucleus did not alter the neurophysin-like immunoreactivity in the internal zone of the median eminence, indicating the integrity of the efferent neurophysin-containing fibers of the supraoptic and paraventricular hypothalamic nuclei. However, there was a concomitant decrease of neurophysin and CRF-like immunoreactivity in the external zone of the median eminence. These results substantiate the hypothesis that the amygdaloid central nucleus can influence the content of CRF-like material in the median eminence via a multisynaptic pathway involving the synthesis of CRF at the level of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. The exact mechanism by which lesion of the amygdaloid central nucleus influences the CRF content in the median eminence remains to be determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicStress Responses and CortisolFrench-language works237,207