Mechanism of the negative inotropic effects of α<sub>1</sub>-adrenoceptor agonists on mouse myocardium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was done to identify the mechanism of the alpha1-adrenoceptor (AR) mediated negative inotropic effects of phenylephrine (PE) on adult mouse myocardium. As reported by others, we also found that the nonselective alpha1AR agonist PE produced a negative inotropic effect on ventricular strips from adult mice that was inhibited by the alpha1AAR antagonist 5-methylurapidil (5MU) but not by the alpha1BAR antagonist chloroethylclonidine (CEC) or the alpha1DAR antagonist BMY 7378. The selective alpha1AAR agonist A61603 also produced a negative inotropic effect, which was antagonized by 5MU. Phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (activator of all PKC isoforms) mimicked the negative inotropic responses to PE and A61603. The negative inotropic effects of PE were inhibited by bisindolylmaleimide (inhibitor of all PKC isoforms) but not by Gö 6976 (inhibitor of Ca2+-dependent PKC). Rottlerin, an inhibitor of Ca2+-independent PKCdelta, antagonized the negative inotropic effects of PE and A61603. PE and A61603 increased the translocation of PKCdelta, which was prevented by rottlerin. These data suggest that the alpha1AR-mediated negative inotropy on adult mouse myocardium is signaled by Ca2+-independent PKCdelta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".