MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995415707 · doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0166

Fighting from Home: The Second World War in Verdun, Quebec (review)

2009· article· en· W1995415707 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tavis Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Military History · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)PrideHistoryGenealogyWorld War IISubject (documents)WritEthnologySociologyLawGeographyPolitical scienceArchaeologyLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Fighting from Home: The Second World War in Verdun, Quebec Tavis Harris Fighting from Home: The Second World War in Verdun, Quebec. By Serge Durflinger. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2006. ISBN 0-7748-1261-3. Maps. Tables. Illustrations. Notes. Select bibliography. Index. Pp. xvi, 279. $29.95. Until recently, historians showed little interest in studies of the Canadian home front during the Second World War. Building upon the works of Jeff Keshen and Magda Fahrni, among others, Serge Durflinger's study of Verdun, Quebec, provides a useful addition to what has lately become a growing body of literature. Though the home front has become a subject of interest, much work remains to be done. While Durflinger's love for his hometown is obvious throughout the study, this does not compromise his objectivity. While he emphasises Verdun's uniqueness, he also argues that the city was in many ways a microcosm of Canada as a whole. Durflinger adopts a community-based approach to explain the Canadian home front during the Second World War, contending that this new model applies to both wartime social history and local studies, providing a useful complement to national–level examinations. He states that while local histories are often criticized for their narrow context, national studies "may neglect local conditions and communities"(p. 4). Durflinger's primary argument is that several factors gave Verdun its unique wartime character, and that regardless of ethnicity or language, Verdun's residents displayed a great degree of community self identification and pride for their contributions to the war effort. The basic questions guiding the work ask why the war effort in Verdun manifested itself in such a 'patriotic' manner, how the war affected [End Page 318] daily life, how the war influenced political relations in Verdun and the degree to which local linguistic divisions reflected national trends. Durflinger largely satisfies his stated goals in a highly readable narrative. The work is filled with anecdotes on topics ranging from the interesting story of the naming of the frigate HMCS Dunver to the town's reaction to the conscription plebiscite. The wide scope of the work provides a thorough view of the war's impact on Verdun. Durflinger not only addresses the citizens' significant support for wartime charities and bond drives, but also the war's socio-economic impact. The war brought industrial jobs to the area, but also created conflicts within families and amongst the city's distinct linguistic communities. Two criticisms of the work can be offered, the first of which centres on the nature and causes of conflict between French and English residents of Verdun. While the author certainly suggests that there were limits to the goodwill and unity, he does not provide a general explanation for the nature of these boundaries. Instead, incidents of French/English divergences are portrayed episodically – the author deals with these cases as they emerged over issues ranging from nominal French-Catholic support for the Anglo-Protestant Young Men's Christian Association to conscription. The second criticism concerns linkages between Verdun and Canada as a whole. Though the author connects several local trends to the wider national experience these links are sometimes lacking or require additional information to fully place the city in a national context. Readers unfamiliar with the Canadian home front during the Second World War may be left wondering how such a charming and "unique" city reflected Canada as a whole. Criticisms aside, this is an excellent work of scholarship, providing a useful addition to both wartime social history and urban studies. It provides a useful model for specialists pursuing local examinations of the Canadian home front during the Second World War, while its lively writing and insightful stories make it enjoyable for those with a general interest in the subject. Tavis Harris Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Copyright © 2009 The Society for Military History

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Military HistorySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207