Effects of bilateral olfactory bulbectomy on <i>N</i>‐methyl‐<scp>D</scp>‐aspartate receptor function: Autoradiographic and behavioral studies in the rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rat bilateral olfactory bulbectomy (OBX) serves as a useful model in the study of depression and the mechanisms of action of antidepressant treatments. Considering the evidence of NMDA receptors involvement in depression, the present study was undertaken in order to investigate the time-course effects of OBX on the NMDA receptor function. Following bilateral olfactory bulbectomy, rats display an increase in locomotor activity and changes in other types of behavior in a novel environment. Autoradiographic experiments using the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist [(125)I]-iodo-MK-801 as the labeling agent showed that this increase in behavioral activities corresponds to a decrease in [(125)I]-iodo-MK-801 binding in a number of brain regions. In most regions, this reduction reached significance by the third week following OBX. However, in some cortical areas-a nucleus of the thalamus (AV) and one of the amygdala (LA)-this reduction was already significant in the first or second week following OBX and lasted throughout the 4 weeks of the study. We also compared the behavioral modifications induced by a challenge injection of MK-801 (0.2 mg/kg i.p.) in OBX and sham-operated rats. This challenge is known to induce hyperlocomotion and a number of stereotypies in naive rats. These effects were drastically reduced in OBX as compared to sham-operated rats. These data are consistent with the above-mentioned decrease in cerebral binding of MK-801 to NMDA receptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".