An amino acid substitution in the putative second extracellular loop of RBC band 3 accounts for the Froese blood group polymorphism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The low incidence RBC antigen Fr(a) has been excluded from 17 of the 25 established blood group systems. Previous genetic analysis assigned the gene controlling Fr(a) expression to the same chromosomal region as the solute carrier family 4, anion exchanger member 1 gene (SLC4A1). Because SLC4A1 encodes RBC band 3 and controls the expression of Diego blood group system antigens, the possible relationship of Fr(a) to the Diego blood group system was investigated by molecular analysis of SLC4A1. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from the members of two unrelated Mennonite kindreds segregating for Fr(a). DNA was extracted, amplified by PCR using intronic primer sets flanking exons 11-20 of SLC4A1, and screened by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. Those exons displaying SSCPs were subjected to DNA sequence analysis. RESULTS: An exon 13 SSCP mobility shift was observed in the DNA from all Fr(a+) persons that was not seen in the DNA from Fr(a-) family members or control subjects. Linkage between the exon 13 SSCP and FR:(a) was established, with peak lods = 3.62 at theta = 0.00 for combined paternal and maternal meioses. DNA sequencing revealed a GAG --> AAG mutation that underlies a Glu480Lys substitution in RBC band 3. CONCLUSIONS: A point mutation in exon 13 of SLC4A1 accounting for a Glu480Lys substitution in band 3 controls Fr(a) expression. On the basis of these our results, the International Society of Blood Transfusion Working Party on Terminology for Red Cell Surface Antigens has assigned Fr(a) to the Diego blood group system, with the designation DI20.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".