SYNTHESIS OF UNNATURAL 7-SUBSTITUTED-1-(2-DEOXY-β-D-RIBOFURANOSYL)ISOCARBOSTYRILS<sup>†</sup>: “THYMINE REPLACEMENT” ANALOGS OF DEOXYTHYMIDINE FOR EVALUATION AS ANTIVIRAL AND ANTICANCER AGENTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A group of unnatural 1-(2-deoxy-beta-D-ribofuranosyl)isocarbostyrils having a variety of C-7 substituents [H, 4,7-(NO2)2, I, CF3, CN, (E)-CH=CH-I, -C triple bond CH, -C triple bond C-I, -C triple bond C-Br, -C=C-Me], designed as nucleoside mimics, were synthesized for evaluation as anticancer and antiviral agents. This class of compounds exhibited weak cytotoxicity in a MTT assay (CC50 = 10(-3) to 10(-5) M range) with the 4,7-dinitro derivative being the most cytotoxic, relative to thymidine (CC50 = 10(-3) to 10(-5) M range), against a variety of cancer cell lines. The 4,7-dinitro, 7-I and 7-C triple bond CH compounds exhibited similar cytotoxicity against non-transfected (KBALB, 143B), and HSV-1 TK+ gene transfected (KBALB-STK, 143B-LTK) cancer cell lines possessing the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) thymidine kinase gene (TK+). This observation indicates that these compounds are not substrates for HSV type-1 TK, and are therefore unlikely to be useful in gene therapy based on the HSV gene therapy paradigm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".