MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nicotine metabolism: the impact of CYP2A6 on estimates of additive genetic influence

2005· article· en· W1995565483 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacogenetics and Genomics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCYP2A6CotinineZygosityNicotinePharmacogeneticsMetaboliteHeritabilityGenotypeGenetic variationBiologyDrug metabolismPharmacokineticsPharmacologyGeneticsMetabolismInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyGeneCYP1A2Cytochrome P450

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To conduct a pharmacogenetic investigation of nicotine metabolism in twins. One hundred and thirty nine twin pairs [110 monozygotic (MZ) and 29 dizygotic (DZ)] underwent a 30-min infusion of stable isotope-labelled nicotine and its major metabolite, cotinine, followed by an 8-h in-hospital stay. Blood and urine samples were taken at regular intervals for analysis of nicotine, cotinine and metabolites by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and subsequent characterization of pharmacokinetic and metabolism phenotypes. DNA was genotyped to confirm zygosity and for variation in the gene for the primary enzyme involved in nicotine metabolism, CYP2A6 (alleles tested: *1, *1x2, *2, *4, *7, *9 and *12). Univariate biometric analyses quantified genetic and environmental influences on each pharmacokinetic measure in the presence and absence of covariates, including measured CYP2A6 genotype. The best-fitting model identified a substantial amount of variation in the weight-adjusted rate of total clearance of nicotine attributable to additive genetic influences [59.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=44.7-70.7]. The majority of variation in the clearance of nicotine via the cotinine pathway was similarly genetically influenced (60.8%, 95% CI=46.9-71.5). Heritability estimates were reduced to 54.2% and 51.8%, respectively, but remained substantial after taking into account the effect of variation in CYP2A6 genotype. These results suggest the involvement of additional genetic factors (e.g. uncharacterized or novel CYP2A6 alleles as well as other genes in the metabolic pathway) that remain to be identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it