Mechanical ventilation may increase susceptibility to the development of bacteremia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined the hypothesis that mechanical ventilation with a potentially injurious strategy would predispose animals to the detrimental effects of subsequent instillation of bacteria. DESIGN: Interventional animal study. SETTING: A university hospital research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Fifty Sprague-Dawley male rats. INTERVENTIONS: Rats were anesthetized and randomized to receive a protective (tidal volume 7 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure 5 cm H(2)O, n = 25) or an injurious ventilatory strategy (tidal volume 21 mL/kg, zero positive end-expiratory pressure, n = 25). Hemodynamics were similar during the 1-hr ventilation period in the two groups. Animals were then disconnected from the ventilator and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was instilled intratracheally before extubation. Thereafter, animals breathed spontaneously; mortality rate was assessed up to 48 hrs, at which time the animals were killed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 48-hr mortality rate was 28% in the protective group and 40% in the injurious group (p = not significant). A positive bacterial culture from the lung was obtained in 56% of the surviving rats in the low tidal volume group and 67% in the high tidal volume group (p =.059). A positive blood bacterial culture was found in 11% of the low tidal volume group and 33% in the high tidal volume group (p <.05). The absolute bacterial count in the blood was lower in the low tidal volume group compared with the high tidal volume group (p <.05). Concentrations of blood tumor necrosis factor-alpha and macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and lung macrophage inflammatory protein-2 at 48 hrs were significantly higher in the low tidal volume group than in the high tidal volume group. CONCLUSIONS: An injurious ventilatory strategy predisposes animals to subsequent bacteremia associated with an impaired host defense reflected by cytokine response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".