Lipids Favoring Inverted Phase Enhance the Ability of Aerolysin To Permeabilize Liposome Bilayers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Channel formation by the bacterial toxin aerolysin follows oligomerization of the protein to produce heptamers that are capable of inserting into lipid bilayers. How insertion occurs is not understood, not only for aerolysin but also for other proteins that can penetrate membranes. We have studied aerolysin channel formation by measuring dye leakage from large unilamellar egg phosphatidylcholine vesicles containing varying amounts of other lipids. The rate of leakage was enhanced in a dose-dependent manner by the presence of phosphatidylethanolamine, diacylglycerol, cholesterol, or hexadecane, all of which are known to favor a lamellar-to-inverted hexagonal (L-H) phase transition. Phosphatidylethanolamine molecular species with low L-H transition temperatures had the largest effects on aerolysin activity. In contrast, the presence in the egg phosphatidylcholine liposomes of lipids that are known to stabilize the lamellar phase, such as sphingomyelin and saturated phosphatidylcholines, reduced the rate of channel formation, as did the presence of lysophosphatidylcholine, which favors positive membrane curvature. When two different lipids that favor hexagonal phase were present with egg PC in the liposomes, their stimulatory effects were additive. Phosphatidylethanolamine and lysophosphatidylcholine canceled each other's effect on channel formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".