Promoting Effects of Bile Acid Load on the Occurrence of Cholangiocarcinoma Induced by Diisopropanolnitrosamine in Hamsters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was performed to clarify the promoting effects of primary or secondary bile acid load on the occurrence of cholangiocarcinoma, using Syrian golden hamsters. These hamsters received subcutaneously diisopropanolnitrosamine (DIPN) once weekly for 10 weeks, and simultaneously were given a standard pellet diet (control group) containing taurocholic acid (TCA group) or deoxycholic acid (DCA group). The rates of cholangiocarcinoma at 20 weeks were 23% in the control group, 60% in the TCA group and 59% in the DCA group. There were significant differences between the control and the TCA or DCA groups (p < 0.05). The rates of proliferation of bile ductules or hyperplasia of the bile duct epithelium and the bromodeoxyuridine labeling indices of bile duct epithelial cells were high in both groups treated with bile acids, compared with those in the control group. Regarding the composition of bile acids in the intraductal bile, the TCA and DCA groups revealed a decrease in primary bile acids and an increase in DCA. These results suggest that both TCA and DCA given orally promote the occurrence of DIPN-induced cholangiocarcinoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".