Primary zoning in pyrochlore group minerals from carbonatites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pyrochlore group minerals have the general formula A16–xB16O48Z8–y·nH2O, with A mainly Na, Ca, Sr, REE, Th, U; B mainly Nb, Ta, Ti and Z being O, F, OH. In this study, pyrochlore specimens were examined from carbonatites at Argor, Carillon Dam, Chilwa Island, Fen, Lueshe, Oka, Mbeya, Meech Lake and Verity. Primary features include a background with little compositional variation, from core to rim, upon which are commonly superimposed narrow oscillatory zones, parallel to {111}. These zones are usually characterized by high Ta, in many cases coupled with U (here Argor, Meech Lake and Verity specimens), but Chilwa Island and Fen pyrochlores have little Ta and zonation is mainly by enrichment in Ce and Nb. Primary zonation may persist through high-temperature metamorphism (Meech Lake and Verity) and metamictization (Meech Lake). Oscillatory zones were generated by a disequilibrium system that cooled under tranquil conditions, signalling absence of magma turbulence and, in many cases, the end of crystal growth. Some fresh crystals (Oka, Fen) have no oscillatory zones, possibly the product of magma turbulence in space or time. Low-temperature effects may mimic those of primary high temperature and are especially characterized by replacement rims, pyrochlore-inpyrochlore veinlets and low A-ion totals (Carillon Dam, Lueshe, Myeba).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".