Improved leucoreduction of red blood cell units prepared after a 24‐h hold with the platelet‐rich plasma method using newly developed filters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A previous study indicated that the extension of whole blood (WB) storage from 8 to 24 h at 20-24 degrees C before the processing of platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-depleted red blood cell (RBC) units had a negative effect on the efficacy of leucoreduction filters. In this study, we further characterized the phenomenon and tested the leucoreduction capacity of two newly developed filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole blood was stored at 20-24 degrees C and processed at 4-h intervals between 8 and 24 h postcollection. Components were leucoreduced before storage. Efficacy of novel filters to leucoreduce 24-h-hold PRP-depleted RBC units was also evaluated. RESULTS: Using a conventional filter, the mean residual white blood cell (WBC) counts in leucoreduced PRP-depleted RBCs were comparable in units prepared within 12 h from collection but gradually increased upon extended preprocessing storage from 0.36 +/- 0.03 at 12 h to 0.46 +/- 0.21, 0.76 +/- 0.54 and 1.72 +/- 1.76 x 10(6) per unit at 16, 20 and 24 h, respectively. However, the mean residual WBC content in 24-h-hold RBCs was reduced to 0.60 +/- 0.39 x 10(6) and 0.46 +/- 0.13 x 10(6) per units using RC2D and the prototypes B-1582 rev B filters, respectively. CONCLUSION: For PRP-depleted RBC units, the extension of the WB room temperature storage from 8 to 24 h before processing is likely to require the introduction of newly developed filters having an increased leucoreduction capacity in order to meet the maximal residual WBC guideline in the RBCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".