Cysteines 431 and 1074 Are Responsible for Inhibitory Disulfide Cross-linking between the Two Nucleotide-binding Sites in Human P-glycoprotein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human wild-type and Cys-less P-glycoproteins were expressed in Pichia pastoris and purified in high yield in detergent-soluble form. Both ran on SDS gels as a single 140-kDa band in the presence of reducing agent and showed strong verapamil-stimulated ATPase activity in the presence of added lipid. The wild type showed spontaneous formation of higher molecular mass species in the absence of reducing agent, and its ATPase was activated by dithiothreitol. Oxidation with Cu(2+) generated the same higher molecular mass species, primarily at 200 and approximately 300 kDa, in high yield. Cross-linking was reversed by dithiothreitol and prevented by pretreatment with N-ethylmaleimide. Using proteins containing different combinations of naturally occurring Cys residues, it was demonstrated that an inhibitory intramolecular disulfide bond forms between Cys-431 and Cys-1074 (located in the Walker A sequences of nucleotide-binding sites 1 and 2, respectively), giving rise to the 200-kDa species. In addition, dimeric P-glycoprotein species ( approximately 300 kDa) form by intermolecular disulfide bonding between Cys-431 and Cys-1074. The ready formation of the intramolecular disulfide between Cys-431 and Cys-1074 establishes that the two nucleotide-binding sites of P-glycoprotein are structurally very close and capable of intimate functional interaction, consistent with available information on the catalytic mechanism. Formation of such a disulfide in vivo could, in principle, underlie a regulatory mechanism and might provide a means of intervention to inhibit P-glycoprotein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".