Evaluation of the efficacy of topical caffeine in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a common disease which often requires long-term maintenance therapy. In psoriatic epidermis, the level of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) decreases. It has been reported that beta-blockers exacerbate existing psoriatic plaque and decrease the concentration of intracellular cAMP. Caffeine is a methylxanthine that inhibits phosphodiesterase enzyme and results in a higher concentration of intracellular cAMP. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the efficacy of topical caffeine 10% in the treatment of psoriasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients were treated by topical application of 10% caffeine or placebo three times per day on the right or left side of the body (randomly selected by flipping a coin). Thirty-nine patients with stable plaque psoriasis were included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, right/left comparison. The patients visited every other week for a period of 8 weeks. Their Psoriatic Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores were assessed at each visit. RESULTS: The reductions in PASI scores measured at the four visits for the caffeine-treated group were 2.64+/-2.89, 4.47+/-3.62, 5.73+/-4.16, 6.58+/-4.40 and for the placebo-treated group the values were 1.45+/-2.32, 3.04+/-2.68, 4.02+/-3.36, 4.43+/-3.45, respectively. Comparing the corresponding results of the two groups, p values at the second, fourth, sixth and eighth week were 0.081, 0.083, 0.079 and 0.047, respectively. Based on presented p values, the treatment with caffeine is more effective than with placebo after 8 weeks (p<0.05), and the only side effect of caffeine is mild itching. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the trial, topical caffeine is an effective, safe and inexpensive treatment for psoriasis, with a delay in action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".