Thermogenic flowering of taro (<i>Colocasia esculenta</i>, Araceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thermogenesis and its association with taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) flowering was studied during the warmest period of the year (December 2002 – February 2003) within a large collection of heterogeneous plant material on Espiritu Santo, Vanuatu. On each studied inflorescence, temperatures of the three main parts of the spadix and the ambient air were recorded during a period of 38 h. The investigation indicates that significant thermogenic activity of taro inflorescences takes place during two successive nights: (1) during the night when an inflorescence becomes odorous (the female phase) and (2) a night later, when microsporogenesis approaches its final phase (the male phase). The highest average difference between mean temperatures of the ambient air and inflorescences were documented during the female phase, at 0500 hours (the mean temperature of the sterile appendix was 29.1 ± 0.9 °C (P = 0.05) and this was 6.8 °C above the temperature of the ambient air). Thermogenic activity is synchronized with the protogynous nature of the species and insect pollination in the early morning hours. Its main putative functions are (1) to reduce the deviations of ambient air temperatures during the most critical periods of flowering, and (2) to promote cross-pollination. It stops 1–1.5 h after pollen has been released.Key words: taro, Colocasia esculenta, thermogenesis, inflorescence development, pollination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".