MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1995930415 · doi:10.1038/oncsis.2012.11

Constitutive activation of breast tumor kinase accelerates cell migration and tumor growth in vivo

2012· article· en· W1995930415 on OpenAlexafffund
Sayem Miah, Alexandre Martin, Kiven Erique Lukong

Bibliographic record

VenueOncogenesis · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMelanoma and MAPK Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCancer researchTyrosine kinaseKinaseCell growthMetastasisProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcChemistryCancerBiologySignal transductionInternal medicineMedicineCell biologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast tumor kinase (BRK) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase overexpressed in most human breast tumors, including lymph node metastases, but undetected in normal mammary tissue or in fibroadenomas. The activity of BRK-like Src family tyrosine kinase, is regulated negatively by phosphorylation of C-terminal tyrosine 447. Although the kinase that regulates BRK activation has not been identified, we and others have previously shown that BRK-Y447F is a constitutively active variant. Because BRK-Y447F significantly enhances the catalytic activity of the enzyme, we investigated the role of the constitutively active BRK variant in tumor formation and metastasis. Using stable breast cancer cell MDA-MB-231 we observed significantly enhanced rates of cell proliferation, migration and tumor formation in BRK-Y447F stable cells compared with wild-type stable cell lines. Our results indicate full activation of BRK is an essential component in the tumorigenic role of BRK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncogenesisSame topicMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysFrench-language works237,207