MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W199598731

Is simpler better? Quality of life based on type of urinary diversion.

2013· article· en· W199598731 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Canter

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrinary diversionMedicineCystectomyUrinary systemQuality of life (healthcare)Bladder cancerSurgeryUrologyCancerInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CANTER DJ. Is simpler better? Quality of life based on type of urinary diversion Can J Urol 2013; 20(1):6632. Although it has been reported that continent urinary diversions may not have increased morbidity in the short term,9 practically speaking, these diversions do require more effort and diligence than an ileal conduit. Ultimately, it is a very personal patient decision as to the type of urinary diversion that one chooses. Clearly, there are some patients whose self-image and other subjective, difficult to elucidate features dictate a continent urinary diversion. A patient choosing a continent urinary diversion requires extensive counseling to ensure that he/she understands the limitations of continent diversions and that these diversions do not function in a similar fashion as a “normal” bladder. In the appropriately selected, highly motivated patient, a continent urinary diversion is a reasonable choice, however as the present study seems to indicate, the majority of patients undergoing cystectomy are equally served with an ileal conduit. Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is an effective yet potentially morbid treatment for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.1 Both the short term and long term complications related to the operation itself as well as the urinary diversion have been well-documented.2,3 One single-institutional study demonstrated that just over 60% of patients experienced a complication related to their urinary diversion and that there were on average 2.3 complications/patient.4 Thus, as with any major reconstructive oncologic surgery, the urologist is trying to maximize cancer control while minimizing the negative effects of the treatment itself. Population-based and institutional studies have demonstrated that younger, less comorbid men with a higher socioeconomic status are more likely to choose a continent urinary diversion versus an ileal conduit.5,6 The perception may be that a continent urinary diversion, especially an orthotopic diversion in men, may replicate both the normal anatomic and functional role of the native bladder, leading to an improved quality of life and self-image. However, the objective data to prove this assertion is lacking, and data indicates that the use of a continent urinary diversion has declined in more recent years.6 In the report contained in this issue of the Canadian Journal of Urology, the authors measured the quality of life in patients post-cystectomy stratified by diversion type using a validated quality of life assessment tool. In their report, the authors found that diversion type was not associated with an improved quality of life after radical cystectomy using the FACT-G Vanderbilt Cystectomy Index.7,8 Although this report had a relatively small number of respondents (n = 84), it is certainly thought-provoking in its findings and potential clinical extrapolations. References

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→