Tubulin immunoreactive neuronal intranuclear inclusions in the human brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intranuclear filamentous and crystalline inclusion bodies have been described in the nuclei of a variety of cells in both normal and pathological states. The functional significance of these structures remains to be elucidated. Moreover, although the proteinaceous nature of these inclusions has been inferred in some histochemical studies, the identity of their constituent proteins remains to be determined. In the present study, immunohistochemistry was used to investigate the presence of intranuclear inclusions in neurones of the human brain which are intensely immunoreactive for the neuronal cytoskeletal protein class III beta tubulin. The ability to label these structures immunohistochemically was exploited to investigate the topographic pattern of distribution of these inclusions in the human brain. Intranuclear inclusions were rod-shaped, polygonal, or irregular in shape. They were present in neurones and ependymal cells. Intranuclear inclusion-bearing neurones were distributed in an anatomically heterogeneous pattern in the brain. Areas exhibiting relatively high densities of inclusions included the substantia inominata and anterior olfactory nucleus, dentate gyrus, substantia nigra, inferior olivary nucleus, and dentate nucleus of the cerebellum. In addition, intranuclear inclusions were prevalent in neurones in layers II, V, and VI of the cerebral cortex. They were particularly prevalent in the mesial basal temporal neocortex. The relationship of these structures to the intranuclear rods and sheets of the classical microscopists is uncertain. The demonstration that they are composed, at least in part, of tubulin, a major cytoskeletal protein, provides important clues regarding the mechanisms underlying their formation and provides a springboard for developing hypotheses regarding their functional significance. Furthermore, the ability to demonstrate these inclusions immunohistochemically provides an avenue for further studies directed at elucidating the potential involvement of these inclusions in various pathological settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".