MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996142024 · doi:10.1038/srep00105

The Impact of Demographic Variables on Disease Spread: Influenza in Remote Communities

2011· article· en· W1996142024 on OpenAlexafffund
Marek Laskowski, Luiz C. Mostaço-Guidolin, Amy L. Greer, Seyed M. Moghadas

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMitacsCompute Canada
KeywordsDiseasePopulationDemographyIncidence (geometry)IndigenousImmunityPublic healthEnvironmental healthGerontologyMedicineBiologyImmunologyEcologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of demographic variables in disease spread in remote and isolated communities is poorly understood. We developed an agent-based model of a small indigenous community to qualitatively study the impact of pre-existing immunity in both young and elderly populations. We observed that in crowded living conditions, the age distribution of the population is a critical factor influencing epidemic spread. As the average age of the population increases, the effect of the pre-existing immunity in older individuals becomes more pronounced in decreasing disease incidence, even when pre-existing immunity levels in young individuals are low. However, in a non-crowded setting with relatively low average persons-per-household, the pre-existing immunity levels of young individuals remains a determining factor, regardless of the age distribution of the population. We suggest that for optimizing public health policies, social and demographic complexities of the remote and vulnerable communities should be carefully evaluated in modeling intervention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.248
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207