Intraoperative Confirmation of Hand Motor Area Identified Preoperatively by Magnetoencephalography
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Presurgical functional mapping using magnetoencephalography (MEG) has been performed for somatosensory, auditory and visual functions; however, the traditional analysis method utilizing dipole source analysis has some inherent limitations when applied to the mapping of cortical motor areas. Recently, a novel source reconstruction algorithm [event-related synthetic aperture magnetometry (erSAM)] has demonstrated success for the localization of motor function in healthy adults. We applied this technique to preoperatively map motor function in a young patient. We then confirmed our mapping with direct cortical stimulation intraoperatively. METHODS: This is a case report of an 8-year-old girl with right hand and arm weakness and poor right hand motor control secondary to a left peri-rolandic tumor. Preoperatively, whole-head MEG was recorded while the patient performed a self-paced button pressing task. Cortical activity associated with the onset of movement was localized to the right hand precentral gyrus superior and medial to the tumor using erSAM, while sensory function was localized posterior to the tumor on the postcentral gyrus. RESULTS: Intraoperative direct cortical stimulation of the motor area identified by MEG resulted in electromyographic activation of intrinsic muscles of the contralateral hand exclusively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a case where direct cortical stimulation has confirmed a motor cortical location identified by the erSAM method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it