MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996190935 · doi:10.1046/j.1468-3083.17.s2.3.x

Clinical response to alefacept: results of a phase 3 study of intramuscular administration of alefacept in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis

2003· article· en· W1996190935 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ortonne Jp

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboPsoriasisAdverse effectInternal medicinePsoriasis Area and Severity IndexClinical trialGastroenterologyDermatologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Recognition of psoriasis as a T-cell-mediated immune disease has led to the development of various therapeutic approaches directed against the pathogenic T cells. Alefacept, a novel and selective biological recombinant protein, binds CD2 on T cells to block T-cell activation and proliferation and interacts with FcgammaRIII receptors on accessory cells to produce selective T-cell apoptosis. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly alefacept IM compared with placebo given for 12 weeks to patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Multicentre (63 sites in Europe, the USA, and Canada), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing 10 mg and 15 mg of alefacept and placebo administered IM once weekly for 12 weeks. Patients were followed for an additional 12 weeks after cessation of therapy. Patients were eligible for enrollment if they were > or = 18 years of age, had chronic plaque psoriasis for > or = 12 months involving > or = 10% body surface area, and had CD4+ T-cell counts at or above the lower limit of normal. RESULTS: 507 patients were enrolled into three treatment groups, which were well balanced for demographic, baseline disease characteristics, and treatment history. A significantly greater percentage of patients treated with alefacept 15 mg IM achieved > or = 75% PASI reduction from baseline 2 weeks after the last dose compared with placebo (21% vs. 5%, P < 0.001); 12% of patients treated with alefacept 10 mg IM reached this level of improvement (P = NS vs. placebo). Alefacept was well tolerated, with adverse events similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with alefacept 15 mg IM provided highly significant improvements in all measures of psoriasis disease activity compared with placebo. Pharmacodynamic data confirmed that alefacept is a selective biological agent that reduces memory-effector T cells (CD4+CD45RO+ and CD8+CD45RO+), the source of the pathogenic mediators of psoriasis, while having relatively no effect on naive T-cell populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologySame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207