Characteristics of Rectangular, Flanged, and End-Confined Reinforced Concrete Masonry Shear Walls for Seismic Design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper contains detailed analyses of an experimental study conducted to evaluate the ductility, stiffness degradation and energy dissipation characteristics of rectangular, flanged, and end-confined reinforced masonry (RM) shear walls failing in flexure. The test program consisted of seven two- and three-story RM shear walls, with aspect ratios of 1.5 and 2.2, tested under reversed cyclic lateral displacements simulating seismic loading effects. Documentation of the compressive strains at the wall toes, wall base curvatures, and ductility levels attained are presented. The paper focuses on determining the extent of plasticity over the wall height, evaluating the contribution of flexure and shear deformations to the overall wall lateral displacements, identifying the trend of stiffness degradation, and quantifying the amount of energy dissipation. The rectangular walls displacement predictions at ultimate loads using Canadian Standards Association (CSA) S304.1 were in better agreement with the experimental results compared to the Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC) code predictions. However, both the MSJC code and the CSA S304.1 significantly overestimated the test results for the flanged and end-confined walls. Analysis of the measured displacements showed that the contribution of shear displacement to the overall wall displacement was, on average, 21 and 25% of the total displacement for the walls with aspect ratio of 2.2 and 1.5, respectively. The relationship between the energy dissipation and the ratio of the postyield to the yield displacements was found to be almost linear for the test walls. In addition, the wall stiffnesses degraded rapidly to about 60% of their gross stiffness at very low drift levels (0.1% drift). Measured compressive strain at the wall toes were almost double those specified in both North American codes. Extent of plasticity over the wall height was about 75% of the wall length. The data presented in this paper is expected to facilitate better understanding of RM wall behavior under in-plane load to researchers, practicing engineers, and code developers. This study aimed at presenting the flanged and end-confined categories as cost-effective alternatives to enhance the seismic performance of midrise RM construction in North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".