MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characteristics of Rectangular, Flanged, and End-Confined Reinforced Concrete Masonry Shear Walls for Seismic Design

2010· article· en· W1996196377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShear wallStructural engineeringDissipationMasonryStiffnessDuctility (Earth science)Materials scienceShear (geology)Displacement (psychology)Geotechnical engineeringMasonry veneerJoint (building)Seismic analysisGeologyComposite materialEngineeringCreepPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper contains detailed analyses of an experimental study conducted to evaluate the ductility, stiffness degradation and energy dissipation characteristics of rectangular, flanged, and end-confined reinforced masonry (RM) shear walls failing in flexure. The test program consisted of seven two- and three-story RM shear walls, with aspect ratios of 1.5 and 2.2, tested under reversed cyclic lateral displacements simulating seismic loading effects. Documentation of the compressive strains at the wall toes, wall base curvatures, and ductility levels attained are presented. The paper focuses on determining the extent of plasticity over the wall height, evaluating the contribution of flexure and shear deformations to the overall wall lateral displacements, identifying the trend of stiffness degradation, and quantifying the amount of energy dissipation. The rectangular walls displacement predictions at ultimate loads using Canadian Standards Association (CSA) S304.1 were in better agreement with the experimental results compared to the Masonry Standards Joint Committee (MSJC) code predictions. However, both the MSJC code and the CSA S304.1 significantly overestimated the test results for the flanged and end-confined walls. Analysis of the measured displacements showed that the contribution of shear displacement to the overall wall displacement was, on average, 21 and 25% of the total displacement for the walls with aspect ratio of 2.2 and 1.5, respectively. The relationship between the energy dissipation and the ratio of the postyield to the yield displacements was found to be almost linear for the test walls. In addition, the wall stiffnesses degraded rapidly to about 60% of their gross stiffness at very low drift levels (0.1% drift). Measured compressive strain at the wall toes were almost double those specified in both North American codes. Extent of plasticity over the wall height was about 75% of the wall length. The data presented in this paper is expected to facilitate better understanding of RM wall behavior under in-plane load to researchers, practicing engineers, and code developers. This study aimed at presenting the flanged and end-confined categories as cost-effective alternatives to enhance the seismic performance of midrise RM construction in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it