MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996236057 · doi:10.1007/s11743-009-1118-6

Pure <i>N</i>‐Alkylaminopropionic Acid and <i>N</i>‐Alkylaminodipropionic Acid Sodium Salts: Synthesis, Characterization, and Physicochemical Properties

2009· article· en· W1996236057 on OpenAlexafffund
Brahim Bettayeb, Caroline Descôteaux, François Benoît, Camille Chapados, Gervais Bérubé

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surfactants and Detergents · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistrySaponificationAqueous solutionAnhydrousIsopropylamineGibbs free energyMethyl acrylateOrganic chemistryCritical micelle concentrationMicelleMichael reactionMethyleneAcrylateNuclear chemistryPolymer chemistryCopolymerPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fourteen pure β‐aminopropionic acid amphoteric surfactants were synthesized from methyl acrylate using primary amines. The synthesis was done in two steps. First, Michael addition of a primary amine to methyl acrylate gave two separable addition products. Second, because the resulting esters gave, by the classical saponification procedure, undesired retro‐Michael products, they were treated with sodium trimethylsilanolate to give the corresponding pure anhydrous acid salt under mild non‐aqueous reaction conditions. Two types of amphoteric surfactants were obtained: the monocarboxylate and the dicarboxylate series. The pure surfactants were characterized by IR, 1 H NMR, and 13 C NMR spectroscopy. The surfactant critical micelle concentrations were evaluated. From these the Gibbs free energy of micellizations [∆ G (–CH 2 –) mic ] were calculated. These are related to the methylene units that contribute an average of −1.0 (±0.3) kJ mol −1 for both the monocarboxylate and the dicarboxylate series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Surfactants and DetergentsSame topicSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsFrench-language works237,207