MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996237011 · doi:10.1139/o10-152

Nucleoside transporter gene expression in wild-type and mENT1 knockout miceThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in a Special Issue entitled CSBMCB 53rd Annual Meeting — Membrane Proteins in Health and Disease, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2011· article· en· W1996237011 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Kathryn Graham, Sylvia Y.M. Yao, Lorelei Johnson, Delores Mowles, Amy M.L. Ng, Jodi Wilkinson, James D. Young, Carol E. Cass

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsKnockout mouseGeneBiologyGene knockoutNucleoside transporterGene expressionNucleosideExonWild typeGene knockinMolecular biologyTransporterMutantGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Owing to the overlapping and redundant roles of the seven mammalian nucleoside transporters (NTs), which belong to two protein families (ENTs and CNTs), the physiological importance of individual NTs has been difficult to assess. Mice that have NT genes knocked out can be a valuable tool in gaining an understanding of the NT proteins. We have generated a strain of mice that is homozygous for a disruption mutation between exons 2 and 3 of the mouse equilibrative nucleoside transporter, mENT1. We have undertaken a quantitative survey of NT gene expression in 10 tissues, as well as microarray analysis of heart and kidney, from wild-type and mENT1 knockout mice. Rather than a consistent change in expression of NT genes in all tissues of mENT1 knockout mice, a complex pattern of changes was found. Some genes, such as those encoding mCNT1 and mCNT3 in colon tissue, exhibited increased expression, whereas other genes, such as those encoding mCNT2 and mENT4 in lung tissue, exhibited decreased expression. Although mCNT3 has been shown to be important in human and rat kidney tissue, we were unable to detect mCNT3 transcripts in the kidney of either the wild-type or mENT1 knockout mice, suggesting differences in renal nucleoside resorption between species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicAdenosine and Purinergic SignalingFrench-language works237,207