MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996243327 · doi:10.2960/j.v36.m574

Length at Age, Sexual Maturity and Distribution of Atlantic Halibut, <i>Hippoglossus hippoglossus</i> L., off the Northeast USA

2006· article· en· W1996243327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Douglas B. Sigourney, Michael R. Ross, Jon Brodziak, John M. Burnett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNortheast Fisheries Science CenterNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationUniversity of Massachusetts
KeywordsHalibutHippoglossus hippoglossusSexual maturityFisheryMaturity (psychological)BiologyPsychologyFish <Actinopterygii>EcologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents first estimates of length at age, size and age at sexual maturity, and depth distributions of Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) off the Northeast USA. The estimates are based on samples collected from spring and autumn bottom trawl surveys in the Gulf of Maine-Georges Bank region and an experimental longline fishery off the coast of Maine (2000)(2001). Longlines targeted larger, faster growing fish than a bottom trawl indicating gear selectivity. Sexual dimorphism in growth was apparent with females attaining greater sizes after age 4. Median age at maturity was estimated to be 6.0 years for males and 7.3 years for females. Adult halibut (>80 cm) occurred at greater average depths than juveniles (<40 cm), but mean depth of capture differed among seasons for all size-classes of halibut. The results suggest that halibut from the Gulf of Maine-Georges Bank region grow faster than those from the Newfoundland-Labrador region. Median ages at maturity of male and female halibut were lower than in other regions of the Northwest Atlantic; however, lengths at maturity were similar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery ScienceSame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207