MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996278610 · doi:10.1115/icone18-29956

Design Concept and Heat Transfer Analysis for a Double Pipe Channel for SCWR Type Reactors

2010· article· en· W1996278610 on OpenAlex
J. Samuel, Glenn Harvel, Igor Pioro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering: Volume 2 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnnulus (botany)CoolantPressure dropHeat transferMechanicsBundleNuclear engineeringMaterials scienceTube (container)Mechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current CANDU-type nuclear reactors use a once-through fuel channel with an annulus gas insulating it from the moderator. The current reference design for a CANDU-type SCWR is to eliminate the annulus gap and use a ceramic insert to insulate the coolant from the moderator. An alternative approach being considered is to use the annulus gap as a coolant pre-heater in a double-pipe configuration (so-called re-entrant channel). The alternative design consists of two tubes, the inner tube (flow channel) and the outer tube (pressure tube). The fuel bundles, similar to those of the current CANDU reactors, are placed in the inner tube. The inner and outer tubes form an annulus through which flows the primary coolant. The coolant will flow through the annulus receiving heat from the inner tube from one end of the channel to another. At the far end, the flow will reverse direction and enter the inner tube, and hence the fuel bundle. At the inlet, the temperature is 350°C for a high-pressure coolant (pressure of 25 MPa), which is just below the pseudocritical point. At the outlet, the temperature is about 625°C at the same pressure (the pressure drop is small and can be neglected). Channel power and flow rate are variable initial conditions. The objective of this work is to model the heat transfer in the proposed fuel channel design. The channel has been divided into several nodes for the inner tube and the annulus gap. The power in each node in the pressure tube is considered to be uniform. The numerical model calculates the temperature profiles, the heat transfer coefficients and the overall heat transfer across the double-pipe fuel channel for a given set of flow, pressure and temperature boundary conditions and the power initial conditions. With the results from the numerical model, the design of the re-entrant (double-pipe) fuel channel can be optimized to improve its efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it