MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards Reusability and Tailorability in Collaborative Learning Systems using IMS-LD and Grid Services

2004· article· en· W1996296669 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Miguel L. Bote‐Lorenzo, Davinia Hernández‐Leo, Yannis Dimitriadis, Juan I. Asensio‐Pérez, Eduardo Gómez‐Sánchez, Guillermo Vega‐Gorgojo, Luis M. Vaquero

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Technology for Learning · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad de ValladolidMinisterio de Ciencia y TecnologíaEuropean Commission
KeywordsComputer scienceReusabilityScope (computer science)Collaborative learningScripting languageGridKnowledge managementSoftware engineeringSoftwareMultimedia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CSCL applications are complex distributed systems that pose special requirements for achieving success in educational settings. Flexible and efficient design of collaborative activities by educators is a key precondition of providing CSCL-tailorable systems, capable of adapting to the needs of each particular learning environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.009
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Technology for LearningSame topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207