Evaluation of Molecular Techniques to Biotype<i>Giardia duodenalis</i>Collected During an Outbreak
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twenty-seven Giardia duodenalis cyst-positive specimens (human, animal, or drinking water) were obtained from a waterborne outbreak in a community in British Columbia, western Canada. Parasite isolates were characterized using molecular techniques at 4 different steps of organism retrieval. None of the drinking water samples (n = 20) infected gerbils and none was successfully amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We were able to genotype 4 of 7 (human and animal) isolates by amplification of DNA from original specimens at the triosephosphate isomerase (tpi) gene locus using PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Five of the original specimens inoculated into Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) were infective and genotyped at the tpi locus using parasite material collected from the gerbil (cysts and trophozoites). Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to biotype trophozoites collected from the gerbils as well as trophozoites from the 4 isolates that adapted to culture. Four of these 5 isolates displayed the same (designated outbreak) biotype at all parasite retrieval steps with all molecular techniques including the originally amplified isolates. PCR-RFLP identified an additional biotype group. The 4 isolates that adapted to in vitro culture were also characterized by isoenzyme electrophoresis (IE). Biotype groups identified in these axenized isolates were all the same with each molecular technique (PCR-RFLP, PFGE, IE) tested. Results of this study demonstrate a need for more sensitive molecular methods to detect and characterize Giardia in original host and environmental samples. Results are also consistent with evidence of biotype changes that occur during the presently used process of isolate retrieval.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".