MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996392275 · doi:10.1071/ar05312

Lifetime changes in wool production of Merino sheep following differential feeding in fetal and early life

2006· article· en· W1996392275 on OpenAlexaff
R. W. Kelly, J. C. Greeff, Iona M. MacLeod

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsDepartment of Environment and Conservation
FundersAustralian Wool Innovation
KeywordsWoolAnimal scienceBiologyWeaningDomestic sheep reproductionLactationMonogastricGestationPregnancyConceptusRuminantAgronomyPasture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In commercial Merino farming, a major determinant of profitability is quantity and quality of wool production. We tested the hypothesis that the level of feed restriction commonly encountered by autumn/early winter lambing Merino ewes in southern Australia was sufficient to have a detrimental effect on their progeny’s lifetime wool production. Two periods of feed restriction of the dams were tested, viz. from day 50 to 140 of gestation (Expt 1), and from day 50 of pregnancy to weaning at 12 weeks of age (Expt 2). In order to reduce the numbers of experimental animals required, identical twin lambs were produced by cloning embryos. There was a total of 35 and 22 pairs of clones in Expts 1 and 2 that were recorded to 6.4 and 4.4 years of age, respectively. In Expt 1 it was estimated (i.e. conceptus-free weight) that the submaintenance (Sub-M) ewes lost 18 kg in weight compared with 9 kg by the Control (C) ewes over the period of differential feeding. In Expt 2 the Sub-M ewes lost 10 kg during pregnancy and 10 kg during lactation, compared with a loss of 3 kg and a gain of 4 kg over the same period in the C ewes. Gestation length was 1.3 days shorter (P < 0.01) in the Sub-M than C ewes in Expt 1. Birthweights of the Sub-M lambs were 0.5 kg lighter than the C lambs in Expts 1 (P < 0.01) and 2 (P < 0.05). At 12 weeks of age, liveweights of the lambs in the Sub-M and C treatments were 24.2 and 25.9 kg in Expt 1 (P < 0.01) and 14.0 and 25.0 kg in Expt 2 (P < 0.001). Corresponding liveweights at 4 months of age were 30.9 and 32.5 kg (P < 0.01) and 19.9 and 29.7 kg (P < 0.001), the Sub-M animals producing less clean wool (0.1 and 0.4 kg, P < 0.01 and < 0.001, Expts 1 and 2, respectively), that was finer in Expt 2 (2.7 µm, P < 0.001) than their C counterparts. Throughout the rest of the study the Sub-M animals in Expt 2 (but not Expt 1) were on average 3.2 kg lighter (P ranging from < 0.05 to < 0.001) than C animals. In both experiments the ratio of secondary to primary wool-producing follicles was lower (1.1–2.6 units, P < 0.001) in the Sub-M than C animals. These differences led to (P < 0.05) lower significantly adult clean wool production of 0.17 kg (Expt 1) and 0.24 kg (Expt 2) per annum. There was no significant interaction between nutritional treatment and age of the animal for clean wool production. Within experiments there were no significant differences between nutritional treatments in any of the wool quality measurements. However, when fibre diameter data for both experiments were combined for 3.4 and 4.4 years of age, the Sub-M animals were significantly broader (0.3 µm, P < 0.01) when compared with the C animals. We conclude that Sub-M feeding of the pregnant ewe will permanently affect liveweight, the wool follicle population, and wool production and quality, in Merino sheep. Extension of the period of under feeding into lactation (Expt 2) appears to increase the amplitude of the differences in young animals, which is largely overcome by the time the animal reaches 2.4 years of age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of Agricultural ResearchSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207