Synergistic Effects of Insulin and Thyroxine on the Differentiation and Proliferation of Epithelial Cells of Suckling Mouse Small Intestine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interactions between insulin, cortisone and thyroxine on the functional maturation of the small intestine were investigated. 8-day-old suckling mice received one injection/day during 3 days of a single hormone or of the following hormonal combinations: insulin plus cortisone or insulin plus thyroxine. The differentiation of intestinal epithelial cells was evaluated by measuring brush border membrane hydrolytic activities and proliferation by establishing the mitotic index and 3H-thymidine incorporation into DNA. The effects of cortisone and insulin on enterocyte's differentiation are additive. Thyroxine accelerates the differentiation and has a limited action on cell proliferation. Insulin exerts a sustained effect on these two aspects of the intestinal maturation and, furthermore, acts in synergism with thyroxine. It appears that insulin, cortisone and thyroxine have their own specific effect on differentiation and proliferation of the epithelial cells and that these three hormones act in cooperation to induce the maturation of the suckling mouse small intestine during postnatal development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".