MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996500540 · doi:10.1167/12.9.1279

Recovering sight in adulthood leads to rapid neurofunctional reorganization of visual functions

2012· article· en· W1996500540 on OpenAlexaff
Giulia Dormal, F. Leporé, Mona Harissi‐Dagher, Armando Bertone, Bruno Rossion, Olivier Collignon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHôpital Notre-DameUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrossmodalPsychologyVisual cortexFunctional magnetic resonance imagingVisual perceptionNeuroscienceContrast (vision)PerceptionVisual systemAudiologyCognitive psychologyComputer visionMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visual deprivation is associated to crossmodal reorganization, leading to the recruitment of the visual cortex for non-visual processing (Bavelier & Neville, 2002). Because of important advances in visual restoration techniques, a crucial question concerns if, how and at what speed the brain of sight-recovery individuals can re-acquire its function to process visual inputs. We used behavioral measures and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to explore the potential neuro-functional modifications taking place in the visual cortex of a low-vision (i.e. legally blind) patient (female, 41) before and after partial vision restoration with Boston keratoprosthesis (Dagher & Dohlman, 2008). Behavioral tasks consisted of computerized tests evaluating visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, face perception and global motion perception. Each fMRI session comprised two runs testing the integrity of a key aspect of the ventral (i.e. face perception) and the dorsal (i.e. motion perception) visual pathways. In order to test for crossmodal reorganization, homologous conditions in the auditory modality were also included (i.e. voices in the ventral run; moving sounds in the dorsal run). The patient was tested 6 days before and 3 days following surgery with identical behavioral and fMRI tasks. In parallel to behavioral improvements, fMRI analyses contrasting differential activations before and after visual restoration revealed massive changes in brain responses. Specifically, we found (1) unspecific activity in the occipital cortex for auditory processing pre-surgery, which was reversed (deactivation) post-surgery; (2) enhanced functional tuning to faces in the right ventral visual pathway (fusiform and occipital "face areas", FFA and OFA) after visual restoration and; (3) reduced responses to motion in V5 bilaterally after visual restoration. These observations provide compelling evidence that the human brain maintains a high degree of plasticity well into adulthood, and that the ventral and dorsal visual pathways might be differently affected by visual deprivation and restoration. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VisionSame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207