Anti-inflammatory effect of<i>Viscum album</i>agglutinin-I (VAA-I): induction of apoptosis in activated neutrophils and inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced neutrophilic inflammation<i>in vivo</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Viscum album agglutinin-I (VAA-I) is a plant lectin which possesses antitumoral properties. This lectin is also known for its immunostimulatory effects when used at low concentrations (1-100 ng/ml). We have demonstrated recently that VAA-I is a potent inducer of human neutrophil apoptosis in vitro when used at higher concentrations. The role of VAA-I on activated neutrophils has not so far been investigated and its potential proinflammatory properties in vivo are poorly documented. Herein, we demonstrated that VAA-I (1000 ng/ml) induces apoptosis in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated human neutrophils in vitro as well as in murine neutrophils isolated from lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neutrophil influx. Using this model, we found that administration of VAA-I (100 or 1000 ng/ml) did not induce an inflammatory response. However, when used at 1 or 10 ng/ml, VAA-I was found to significantly induce a transitory inflammatory response, based on an increased leucocyte infiltration (>98% neutrophils). Also, we found that VAA-I inhibits LPS-induced neutrophil influx when administered simultaneously with LPS. In such conditions, some characteristic apoptotic neutrophils were observed in the pouch. Unlike LPS, which increased the production of some cytokines, VAA-I (1 or 10 ng/ml) did not increase the production of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1Ra, IL-1alpha, IL-beta, IL-8, IL-10 or IL-12 (p70) in human neutrophils. We conclude that VAA-I possesses the ability to induce apoptosis of preactivated neutrophils at a concentration that does not induce a proinflammatory response. Moreover, we conclude that VAA-I can inhibit a LPS-induced proinflammatory response in vivo. These data may provide new clinical perspectives in future mistletoe therapy and favour its potential utilization based on anti-inflammatory activity that at first appears contradictory with its use as immunostimulant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".