Participant perspectives on housing first and recovery: Early findings from the At Home/Chez Soi project.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study presents early qualitative findings from participant narratives collected for At Home/Chez Soi, a pan-Canadian demonstration project evaluating the Housing First approach. The aim of the study was to better understand how receiving housing prior to treatment impacts engagement and envisioned recovery for previously homeless individuals with mental illness. METHOD: Semistructured interviews were conducted with recently housed participants within the five research sites (N = 27). An analysis of early findings was performed, and themes were identified using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Most participants reported that housing represents an early step in rebuilding identity, which enabled them to envision a different future. A subgroup experienced demoralization related to personal challenges, and expressed concerns about adjustment issues and social isolation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: By providing choice regarding housing, Housing First facilitates a sense of personhood, which is essential to recovery. However, some recently housed individuals with complex needs may require additional supports to address early adjustment issues. (
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it