Early Weeks After Premature Birth as Experienced by Latina Adolescent Mothers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the early adaptation challenges and strengths of young mothers with preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: Naturalistic inquiry was used to obtain a subjective description of the postpartum experience of 12 adolescent Latina mothers who enrolled in an intervention study subsequent to the preterm birth of their first baby. Intervention visits with the mother and infant offered the opportunity to repeatedly observe them and discuss with the mother her views on this life transition. RESULTS: Themes that emerged from discussions with the mothers were (a) devotion to the baby, (b) responsibilities, and (c) relationships. The adolescent mothers displayed devotion to their babies in their gentle touch and positive comments to and about their baby, their interest and adherence to an intervention program that promoted holding and provided information about infant development, and their advocacy with medical professionals and family members for their baby's well-being. Interdependence regarding the sharing of responsibilities to benefit the family was evident within families. Family relationships were supportive and vital to the adolescent mothers. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Latina adolescent mothers may benefit from recognizing their strengths and incorporating these strengths into the care plan for their infants. Warm, supportive relationships between the young mothers and the healthcare professional in this study resulted in the mothers considering new information addressing care of their infants, even if the information was different from their cultural mores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".