Single-point incremental forming of 6061-T6 using electrically assisted forming methods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, large direct current is applied through the tool to improve formability while forming 6061-T6 Al using single-point incremental forming. Special attention is paid to the direct effect of current density, as opposed to bulk resistive heating, to determine whether the electroplastic effect is significant in raising the formability without requiring temperature rise. Tests are performed to determine the maximum wall angle that can be formed for a variety of current and tool settings. The area of contact between the tool and sheet is modeled, and a control system is proposed and tested to vary the current to maintain a constant current density during tests. The phenomenon of current threshold density is observed at a current density range agreeing with previous studies forming the same material in different loading cases. A significant formability increase is observed at a range of current density values that agree with previously published work with this material in different loading cases. Surface roughness and spalling are also shown to be directly affected by current.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it