Intergranular strain correlation with magnetic behavior in steel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The correlation between the magnetic behavior and intergranular residual strain was investigated on several mild steel samples which were plastically deformed in the range 0.5%–20% engineering strain followed by unloading. At low deformation levels (0.5%–∼2%) the samples exhibited Luders banding, but after 2% strain the samples appeared uniformly deformed. Magnetic Barkhausen noise (MBN) measurements were used to characterize magnetic behavior and neutron diffraction measurements were used to determine the inter-granular strain. MBN results indicated a high MBN value in the direction transverse to the applied stress. This corresponded to a high strain in the (100) crystallographic direction (the easy magnetization direction), as observed using neutron diffraction. Little correlation was obtained between the MBN result and the (112) strain, which is generally assumed to reflect the macroscopic residual stress. Angular MBN and neutron diffraction results further confirmed the strong correlation between the (100) strain and the MBN result.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".